Understanding how a person thinks, learns, and functions can be life‑changing, especially when academic performance, attention, social skills, or decision‑making seems to lag behind potential. At Rocky Mountain Psychological Services (RMPS) in Calgary, our psychologists conduct thorough psychological evaluations that provide clarity on learning, developmental, and cognitive needs. These assessments guide effective support at school, home, or the workplace.
In this blog, we’ll explain five major types of assessments: ADHD, giftedness, psychoeducational, Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and capacity, including when each is recommended, how they work, and why they’re important.
What Is a Psychological Assessment?
A psychological assessment is a systematic, evidence‑based process used by psychologists to understand a person’s cognitive functioning, learning profile, attention, behavior, emotional strengths and challenges, and, when necessary, decision‑making capacity. These assessments are informed by standardized testing, caregiver/teacher interviews, questionnaires, observation, and clinical expertise.
A strong research foundation supports the use of structured, multi‑method assessments for accurate interpretation and recommendations, rather than relying solely on informal impressions or brief screening tools. Comprehensive assessments bring together multiple data sources for the most reliable conclusions. (Pelham, Jr. et al., 2005)
ADHD Assessment: When Attention Challenges Persist
Attention‑Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common reasons families seek psychological testing. Children with ADHD often struggle with focus, organization, task completion, and impulse control, but these behaviours can also overlap with anxiety, learning difficulties, or executive functioning challenges.
When to Consider an ADHD Assessment
You may consider ADHD evaluation if:
- A child or adult consistently struggles with inattention or hyperactivity across settings
- Work performance, school achievement, or daily functioning is significantly impacted
- There are ongoing concerns despite classroom or behavior support
What the Research Says
Scientific evidence supports the use of structured rating scales, standardized interviews, and multiple observers (e.g., parents and teachers) in the assessment process. These methods are considered evidence‑based and improve diagnostic validity. (Pelham, Jr. et al., 2005)
A systematic review of ADHD tools highlights that no single measure is sufficient — multiple instruments plus clinical judgment provide the most accurate picture. (Crocker et al., 2025)
ADHD often involves subtle differences in cognitive functioning, such as reduced working memory and attentional control, which have been confirmed in neuropsychological research. (Wilson, 2024)
How RMPS Conducts ADHD Assessment
At RMPS in Calgary, ADHD assessments include:
- Structured clinical interviews
- Standardized rating scales from parents and teachers
- Cognitive testing to understand whether cognitive profile could explain symptoms and also to evaluate executive functioning
- Feedback and recommendations tailored to individual needs
This multi‑method approach increases accuracy and informs meaningful intervention strategies.
Gifted Testing: Recognizing Advanced Abilities
Giftedness isn’t just “doing well in school”, it’s advanced reasoning, creativity, and learning potential beyond what’s expected for age. Without proper identification, gifted students may become bored, underchallenged, or misunderstood. A comprehensive gifted assessment helps clarify a child’s strengths and inform appropriate enrichment or educational planning.
When to Seek Gifted Evaluation
Consider testing if a child:
- Learns new concepts rapidly
- Asks probing questions beyond grade level
- Shows advanced problem‑solving or creative capabilities
- Appears disengaged or bored in academic settings
Research Evidence
Systematic research stresses that gifted identification must go beyond a single IQ score and consider broader learning and reasoning potential. Standardized cognitive tests combined with qualitative data (like teacher observations) give a more complete understanding of exceptional ability. (Delgado-Valencia, 2025)
How RMPS Helps
Our gifted assessments use recognized cognitive measures that capture reasoning and potential, supported by staff familiar with educational pathways such as enhanced programs and individualized planning.
Psychoeducational Assessment: Unlocking the Learning Profile
A psychoeducational assessment is one of the most comprehensive evaluations available. It blends academic achievement testing with cognitive assessments to identify why a child may be struggling academically or behaviourally, and to distinguish among possibilities such as learning disability, ADHD, giftedness, or processing challenges.
When This Assessment Is Useful
Psychoeducational testing should be considered when:
- Academic performance is inconsistent
- There are concerns about reading, writing, or math
- Behavioral struggles overlap with learning challenges
- Standard classroom interventions are not yielding improvement
Research Supports the Approach
Peer‑reviewed research emphasizes that psychoeducational assessments provide critical insights into learning strengths and weaknesses, guiding tailored supports rather than one‑size‑fits‑all solutions. (Bulut, 2024)
By integrating multiple formal assessment tools, cognitive, achievement, and behavioral, psychologists can make data‑based decisions about learning needs and plan effective accommodations or interventions.
RMPS Psychoeducational Process
At RMPS, these assessments include:
- Intelligence and achievement tests
- Executive functioning and memory measures
- Behavioral and emotional questionnaires
- A detailed written report and comprehensive feedback session
Our goal is to move beyond simple “labels” to actionable insights that support sustained academic improvement.
Autism (ASD) Assessment: Clarifying Social and Communication Profiles
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition that affects social communication, behavior patterns, and sensory processing. An autism assessment is recommended when a child or adult shows persistent social communication differences or behavioral patterns consistent with ASD.
When to Consider ASD Evaluation
An ASD evaluation is appropriate if a person shows:
- Challenges with social interaction and understanding social cues
- Repetitive behaviors or restricted interests
- Sensory sensitivities
- Difficulty with flexible behavior or adjusting to change
Evidence on ASD Diagnostic Tools
A recent systematic review examined the performance of autism diagnostic instruments, particularly in children with overlapping symptoms like ADHD. Researchers found that many tools show strong specificity (the ability to rule out ASD when it’s not present), but noted the importance of clinical expertise and multi‑method assessment to distinguish ASD from related profiles accurately. (Udhnani et al., 2025)
Research on cognitive functioning in ASD also underscores the value of comprehensive evaluation, as autistic individuals may have distinct patterns of strengths (e.g., reasoning) and areas of relative challenge (e.g., processing speed), which are useful to identify in educational and social planning. (Wilson, 2024)
At RMPS
ASD assessments include observations, structured diagnostic tools, developmental history interviews, and caregiver input, all synthesized into a thorough report with recommendations for support across home, school, and community settings.
Capacity Assessment: Evaluating Adult Decision‑Making Ability
Different from developmental assessments, capacity assessments focus on whether an adult can make informed decisions about personal care, finances, health care, or accommodations. These are often requested when there are concerns about cognitive decline, memory impairment, or serious decision‑making challenges.
A formal capacity assessment is especially relevant for legal decisions, medical consent determinations, or planning roles such as guardianship or trusteeship. Psychologists use structured interviews and cognitive measures to determine whether an individual understands information and the consequences of choices.
Research on capacity assessment underscores the importance of standardized, detail‑oriented evaluation in high‑stakes decisions where autonomy and safety must be balanced. (General clinical consensus supports structured evaluation methods, though specific research is varied.)
At RMPS, capacity evaluations follow best practice protocols to provide clear, legally defensible results for individuals and caregivers.
Final Thoughts
A psychological assessment is not about “labeling” a person, it’s about understanding strengths, challenges, and pathways forward. Whether you’re a parent, teacher, or adult considering evaluation, a comprehensive assessment can clarify why certain difficulties persist and guide effective, evidence‑based support strategies.
At Rocky Mountain Psychological Services in Calgary, our experienced psychologists provide thorough assessments, clear feedback, and actionable recommendations tailored to each individual. We walk families and individuals through every step, ensuring an informed and supportive assessment experience.
Ready to take the next step?
Contact RMPS today for a consultation:
Phone: (403) 245‑5981
Email: intake@rmpsychservices.com
Let us help you find clarity and confidence on your journey.
References
Bulut, O. (2024). Psycho‑Educational Assessments: Theory and Practice. Journal of Intelligence, 12(3), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12030031
Crocker, S.L., Roemer, A., Strohmaier, S. et al. A Scoping Review of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Assessment and Diagnosis: Tools, Practices, and Sex Bias. Adv Neurodev Disord (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-025-00452-2
Pelham, W. E., Jr, Fabiano, G. A., & Massetti, G. M. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53, 34(3), 449–476. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3403_5
Wilson, A. C. (2024). Cognitive profile in autism and ADHD: A meta‑analysis of performance on the WAIS‑IV and WISC‑V. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 39(4), 498–515. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acad073
Delgado-Valencia, L., Delgado, B., Navarro-Soria, I., Torrecillas, M., Rosales-Gómez, M., Sánchez-Herrera, M. d. l. C., & Soto-Díaz, M. (2025). The Identification of Giftedness in Children: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1012. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081012