At Rocky Mountain Psychological Services (RMPS) in Calgary, parents frequently ask how technology, and more recently artificial intelligence (AI), fits into healthy child development. Many families are understandably cautious. Screens are often associated with attention difficulties, emotional dysregulation, and behavioural struggles. At the same time, research and clinical experience suggest that technology itself is not inherently harmful, it is how and why it is used that matters most.
This raises an important question:
Can AI support my child’s behaviour in a healthy, developmentally appropriate way?
From an RMPS perspective, AI can be helpful when it is used as a calm coaching tool, one that supports emotional regulation, executive functioning, and problem-solving, rather than as a way to control behaviour or replace human connection. In this blog, we explore what research tells us, how parents can use AI intentionally, and where its limits are.
Understanding Child Behaviour: A Psychological Foundation
Before considering AI, it is essential to understand behaviour itself. At RMPS, we view behaviour as communication, not defiance. Children’s behaviour reflects their capacity to regulate emotions, manage stress, and respond to environmental demands.
Research in developmental psychology consistently shows that behavioural challenges are most often linked to:
- Emotional regulation difficulties
- Executive functioning skill gaps
- Cognitive overload or stress
- Developmental immaturity
When children lack the skills to cope, behaviour becomes the outlet (Eisenberg et al., 2010). Any tool that supports behaviour effectively must therefore help build skills and reduce nervous system overload, not simply enforce compliance.
Technology, AI, and Child Development: What the Research Says
Research does not support a blanket “technology is bad” conclusion. Instead, studies emphasize context, content, and adult involvement as the key factors influencing outcomes.
A large Canadian review published in the Canadian Journal of Psychiatry highlights that technology can support child development when used intentionally, with adult guidance and clear boundaries (Waddell et al., 2014). Similarly, research by Radesky et al. (2020) shows that digital tools can either support or disrupt self-regulation depending on how caregivers integrate them into daily routines.
From a clinical perspective at RMPS, AI fits into this framework as a supportive scaffold, useful when guided by parents and aligned with a child’s developmental needs.
What Parents Usually Mean by “AI Support”
In everyday parenting, AI support often includes:
- Chat-based tools that help parents generate calm responses
- Apps that guide emotional regulation or mindfulness
- Tools that help children label emotions or problem-solve
- Digital planners or visual schedules
- Writing and organization supports for learning
These tools function much like visual aids or checklists. Research on executive functioning supports shows that external scaffolds reduce cognitive load and improve task completion, especially for children with ADHD or learning differences (Diamond, 2013).
AI as a Calm Coaching Tool
1. Supporting Parental Self-Regulation First
Research consistently shows that children co-regulate with adults. When parents are calm and responsive, children are more likely to regulate successfully (Murray et al., 2016). In moments of stress, however, this is difficult.
AI can help parents pause and reflect before reacting.
Example AI prompt for parents:
“My child is having a meltdown over homework. Help me respond calmly and support emotional regulation.”
This aligns with evidence-based parenting models that emphasize co-regulation before behaviour correction (Gottman & DeClaire, 1997).
2. Building Emotional Literacy in Children
Emotional literacy, the ability to identify and name emotions, is a critical predictor of behavioural regulation. Children who can label emotions show fewer behavioural outbursts and better coping skills (Denham et al., 2012).
AI tools can support this learning by:
- Explaining emotions in child-friendly language
- Suggesting coping strategies
- Prompting reflection
Example AI prompt for parents to use with children:
“Explain frustration to a 6-year-old and suggest two calm ways to cope.”
At RMPS, we emphasize that AI should reinforce emotional learning, not replace parent–child conversations.
3. Coaching Executive Functioning Skills
Executive functioning challenges are common in children with ADHD, anxiety, and learning differences. Research shows that skills such as planning, task initiation, and working memory develop gradually into early adulthood (Best & Miller, 2010).
AI can support executive functioning by:
- Breaking tasks into smaller steps
- Creating visual schedules
- Supporting time management
Example AI prompt:
“Create a simple after-school routine for a child who gets overwhelmed by homework.”
These tools act as temporary scaffolds, supporting skill development rather than dependency.
4. Reducing Power Struggles and Escalation
Behavioural research highlights that predictability and structure reduce anxiety and oppositional behaviour (Kazdin, 2005). AI-generated routines or checklists can provide consistent structure without repeated verbal reminders.
This can reduce emotional escalation and help families shift from power struggles to collaboration.
AI and Neurodivergent Children
Parents often ask whether AI tools are appropriate for neurodivergent children.
ADHD
Research shows that external supports improve task initiation and follow-through in children with ADHD (Barkley, 2012). AI tools can support reminders, task breakdown, and emotional regulation, but should be used selectively to avoid overload.
Anxiety
AI may help children identify worries and generate coping statements. However, studies caution that reassurance-seeking behaviours can increase anxiety if not guided appropriately (Rapee et al., 2009).
Learning Differences
AI can support organization and written expression, but should align with assessment-informed learning profiles to reduce cognitive demand.
At RMPS, we strongly recommend grounding AI use in psychological or psychoeducational assessment findings when concerns are ongoing.
What AI Cannot Replace
Despite its potential benefits, AI has clear limitations. It cannot replace:
- Human connection and empathy
- Emotional attunement
- Psychological assessment
- Counselling or therapy
Research consistently shows that secure relationships and responsive caregiving are the strongest predictors of emotional regulation and behavioural resilience (Shonkoff & Phillips, 2000). AI should support, but not replace these foundations.
Responsible Use: Guidelines for Parents
From an RMPS perspective, AI supports behaviour best when parents:
- Use AI to support reflection, not control
- Keep AI use transparent with children
- Focus on skill-building, not compliance
- Balance screen use with real interaction
- Monitor emotional impact and adjust accordingly
When Behaviour Signals the Need for Professional Support
AI may help with everyday challenges, but persistent behavioural difficulties often indicate deeper needs. Research shows that early assessment and intervention significantly improve long-term outcomes (Waddell et al., 2005).
While AI tools and at-home strategies can be helpful for everyday challenges, some behavioural concerns signal the need for professional support. If a child’s behaviour is persistent, escalating, or interfering with daily functioning, it may reflect underlying emotional, learning, or developmental needs that require deeper understanding.
Parents may want to seek professional guidance if their child experiences frequent emotional outbursts, ongoing anxiety or withdrawal, significant changes in mood or behaviour, or increasing difficulties at school or with peers. Behaviour that leads to distress for the child or family, despite consistent efforts to support it, often benefits from psychological assessment or counselling.
At RMPS, professional support focuses on understanding why behaviour is occurring, not just managing what it looks like. Through assessment and counselling, families gain clarity, evidence-based recommendations, and support that goes beyond what technology alone can provide.
How RMPS Supports Families Beyond Technology
At Rocky Mountain Psychological Services, we help families understand the underlying factors driving behaviour. Our services include:
- Psychological and psychoeducational assessments
- Child and teen counselling
- Parent consultation and coaching
- Support for ADHD, anxiety, learning differences, and emotional regulation
We view AI as a potential adjunct, most effective when embedded within evidence-based, individualized care.
A Balanced Perspective on AI and Behaviour
AI is neither a cure nor a risk in itself. Research and clinical experience suggest it can:
- Support parental regulation
- Reinforce emotional literacy
- Scaffold executive functioning skills
When misused, it can increase overstimulation or avoidance. The difference lies in intentional, guided use.
Final Thoughts from RMPS
Behavioral challenges are complex and deeply human. No technology can replace empathy, connection, and professional support when needed. However, when used as a calm coaching tool, AI can support parents in helping children build emotional regulation, confidence, and resilience.
At Rocky Mountain Psychological Services, we encourage families to approach AI thoughtfully, guided by developmental science, evidence-based practice, and compassion. If you are unsure how technology fits into your child’s behavioural needs, our Calgary-based team is here to help.
References
Barkley, R. A. (2012). Executive functions: What they are, how they work, and why they evolved. Guilford Press.
Best, J. R., & Miller, P. H. (2010). A developmental perspective on executive function. Child Development, 81(6), 1641–1660.
Denham, S. A., et al. (2012). Emotional competence and early school success. Early Education and Development, 23(1), 1–27.
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168.
Eisenberg, N., et al. (2010). Emotion-related self-regulation and its relation to children’s maladjustment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 495–525.
Gottman, J., & DeClaire, J. (1997). The heart of parenting. Simon & Schuster.
Kazdin, A. E. (2005). Parent management training. Oxford University Press.
Murray, L., et al. (2016). Parent–child interaction and self-regulation. Developmental Review, 39, 1–27.
Radesky, J. S., et al. (2020). Digital media and child development. Pediatrics, 145(1).
Rapee, R. M., et al. (2009). Anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(1–2), 1–13.
Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods. National Academy Press.
Waddell, C., McEwan, K., Shepherd, C. A., Offord, D. R., & Hua, J. M. (2005). A public health strategy to improve the mental health of Canadian children. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50(4), 226–233.
Waddell, C., et al. (2014). Child mental health and technology. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 59(6), 324–330.